10/25, 10am social policy class
Oct. 25th, 2000 06:27 pmi keep waking up more tired than when i went to bed, probably from running in my dreams all night. running and fighting and looking for something, getting more and more frantic because i don't know what i'm trying to find. it's like fighting inside a marshmallow - if i try to punch something, my fist starts an inch away from the target and moves slowly, so the most i can do is push ineffectually.
so the poor get poorer and the rich get richer. in victorian england, the solution to the 'poor problem' was essentially to put them in workhouses till they either died there, or stopped asking for money (which, by law, they were supposed to be given) and *then* died. but if you kill off all the paupers, will the lower-but-not-impoverished class start getting poorer until they take the place of the destitute people who got killed off? or, is there a sort of midpoint at which everyone above gets richer and everyone below gets porrer, so that the lower class would eventually become destitute whether or not the paupers were killed off?
so the poor get poorer and the rich get richer. in victorian england, the solution to the 'poor problem' was essentially to put them in workhouses till they either died there, or stopped asking for money (which, by law, they were supposed to be given) and *then* died. but if you kill off all the paupers, will the lower-but-not-impoverished class start getting poorer until they take the place of the destitute people who got killed off? or, is there a sort of midpoint at which everyone above gets richer and everyone below gets porrer, so that the lower class would eventually become destitute whether or not the paupers were killed off?