(no subject)
Feb. 21st, 2001 01:50 amwe were talking about sumatran frogs in bio. you know, the ones that lay their eggs on their backs, and then grow skin over the eggs. and we started discussing whether you could fool the frog, like getting it to grow skin over a marble or something. and lock said, 'and of course the military has done numerous experiments implanting bombs in sumatran frogs..'
okay, so it was funnier when he said it.
randomness from sociology:
talcott is a cool name. so is kendall. and neither of those were mentioned relating to saa - talcott parsons is the founder of structural functionalism, and kendall tempest is one of the guys i've fenced with.
nallia just mentioned something about "math parties". wtf?
he wastes so much time asking our permission for things - 'do you mind if i expand on your answer?' he apparently is opposed to 'academic hierarchies' and thinks of us as (and treats us as) colleagues who know just as much as he does. only we don't. and we're paying for him to teach us, not to talk with us. someone made a crack about how if we're equals, does that mean we should be paid to take the class or that he should be paying to teach it? heh. zing.
i read some scifi book a while ago about a physicist or something to that effect who grew up on a non-capitalist planet, founded by a woman named odo who was a rebel from another, highly politicized planet. on the new planet, the concept of ownership was learned out of children. they did still have a word for 'my', though, which was kinda odd. i can't remember what it was called, but the point was that it's human nature to want to own things and have power over others, and no matter how much you try to get rid of it, the most you can do is change its form and deny its existence.
nallia: what's your name?
student: andy.
nallia: would you prefer to be called andrew?
...uh, if he preferred to be called andrew, wouldn't he have said that's what his name was?
i need something to doodle. i want to draw, but i don't have anything to draw. it's very sad.
okay, so it was funnier when he said it.
randomness from sociology:
talcott is a cool name. so is kendall. and neither of those were mentioned relating to saa - talcott parsons is the founder of structural functionalism, and kendall tempest is one of the guys i've fenced with.
nallia just mentioned something about "math parties". wtf?
he wastes so much time asking our permission for things - 'do you mind if i expand on your answer?' he apparently is opposed to 'academic hierarchies' and thinks of us as (and treats us as) colleagues who know just as much as he does. only we don't. and we're paying for him to teach us, not to talk with us. someone made a crack about how if we're equals, does that mean we should be paid to take the class or that he should be paying to teach it? heh. zing.
i read some scifi book a while ago about a physicist or something to that effect who grew up on a non-capitalist planet, founded by a woman named odo who was a rebel from another, highly politicized planet. on the new planet, the concept of ownership was learned out of children. they did still have a word for 'my', though, which was kinda odd. i can't remember what it was called, but the point was that it's human nature to want to own things and have power over others, and no matter how much you try to get rid of it, the most you can do is change its form and deny its existence.
nallia: what's your name?
student: andy.
nallia: would you prefer to be called andrew?
...uh, if he preferred to be called andrew, wouldn't he have said that's what his name was?
i need something to doodle. i want to draw, but i don't have anything to draw. it's very sad.