(no subject)
Apr. 7th, 2001 03:03 amso a kid wore a straight pride shirt to school, and got sent home to change. seems like a case of the administration being oversensitive and thus discriminating against him, right? (the story is somewhere on cnn, i can't find a link any more.) but then you notice that when he filed a lawsuit, he got the american family association to defend him. you know, the right wing family value people. makes you think that maybe something's up more than him wearing a variation on a 'gay pride' shirt. and then ciannait linked me to this article. which gives enough background to make it abundantly clear that it wasn't a pro-straight statement, it was explicitly anti-gay.
bleh. in theory, as an isolated incident, i'd say the student was in the right. the administration was violating his freedom of speech. only it wasn't a free speech issue, wearing the shirt - after the discussion the day before - was premeditated harassment.
bleh. in theory, as an isolated incident, i'd say the student was in the right. the administration was violating his freedom of speech. only it wasn't a free speech issue, wearing the shirt - after the discussion the day before - was premeditated harassment.